I wrote a function which takes a pointer to an array to initialize its values:
我写了一个函数,它接受一个指向数组的指针来初始化它的值:
#define FIXED_SIZE 256
int Foo(int *pArray[FIXED_SIZE])
{
/*...*/
}
//Call:
int array[FIXED_SIZE];
Foo(&array);
And it doesn't compile:
它不编译:
error C2664: 'Foo' : cannot convert parameter 1 from 'int (*__w64 )[256]' to 'int *[]'
错误C2664:'Foo':无法将参数1从'int(* __ w64)[256]'转换为'int * []'
However, I hacked this together:
但是,我一起攻击了这个:
typedef int FixedArray[FIXED_SIZE];
int Foo(FixedArray *pArray)
{
/*...*/
}
//Call:
FixedArray array;
Foo(&array);
And it works. What am I missing in the first definition? I thought the two would be equivalent...
它有效。我在第一个定义中缺少什么?我以为这两个是等价的......
13
int Foo(int *pArray[FIXED_SIZE])
{
/*...*/
}
In the first case, pArray
is an array of pointers, not a pointer to an array.
在第一种情况下,pArray是一个指针数组,而不是指向数组的指针。
You need parentheses to use a pointer to an array:
您需要括号来使用指向数组的指针:
int Foo(int (*pArray)[FIXED_SIZE])
You get this for free with the typedef
(since it's already a type, the *
has a different meaning). Put differently, the typedef
sort of comes with its own parentheses.
你可以使用typedef免费获得这个(因为它已经是一个类型,*具有不同的含义)。换句话说,typedef类型带有自己的括号。
Note: experience shows that in 99% of the cases where someone uses a pointer to an array, they could and should actually just use a pointer to the first element.
注意:经验表明,在99%的情况下,有人使用指向数组的指针,他们可以而且实际上应该只使用指向第一个元素的指针。
2
One simple thing is to remember the clockwise-spiral rule which can be found at http://c-faq.com/decl/spiral.anderson.html
一个简单的事情是记住顺时针螺旋规则,可以在http://c-faq.com/decl/spiral.anderson.html找到。
That would evaluate the first one to be an array of pointers . The second is pointer to array of fixed size.
那将评估第一个是一个指针数组。第二个是指向固定大小数组的指针。
0
An array decays to a pointer. So, it works in the second case. While in the first case, the function parameter is an array of pointers but not a pointer to integer pointing to the first element in the sequence.
数组衰减到指针。所以,它适用于第二种情况。在第一种情况下,函数参数是一个指针数组,但不是一个指向序列中第一个元素的整数的指针。
本站翻译的文章,版权归属于本站,未经许可禁止转摘,转摘请注明本文地址:http://www.silva-art.net/blog/2012/03/16/72573b9f72f0a693e723e06ae0782c35.html。