React:内联有条件地将prop传递给组件

[英]React: inline conditionally pass prop to component


I would like to know if there is a better way to conditionally pass a prop than using an if-statement.

我想知道是否有一种更好的方式来有条件地传递道具而不是使用if语句。

For example, right now I have:

例如,我现在有:

var parent = React.createClass({
  propTypes: {
    editable: React.PropTypes.bool.isRequired,
    editableOpts: React.PropTypes.shape({...})
  },
  render: function() {
    if(this.props.editable) {
      return (
        <Child editable={this.props.editableOpts} />
      );
    } else {
      // In this case, Child will use the editableOpts from its own getDefaultProps()
      return (
        <Child />
      );
    }
  }
});

Is there a way to write this without the if-statement? I am was thinking something along the lines of a type of inline-if-statement in the JSX:

有没有办法在没有if语句的情况下写这个?我正在考虑JSX中一种内联if语句的内容:

var parent = React.createClass({
  propTypes: {
    editable: React.PropTypes.bool.isRequired,
    editableOpts: React.PropTypes.shape({...})
  },
  render: function() {
    return (
      <Child 
        {this.props.editable ? editable={this.props.editableOpts} : null} 
      />
    );
  }
});

To wrap-up: I'm trying to find a way to define a prop for Child, but pass a value (or do something else) such that Child still pulls that prop's value from Child's own getDefaultProps().

总结:我正试图找到一种方法为Child定义道具,但传递一个值(或做其他事情),使Child仍然从Child自己的getDefaultProps()中提取该道具的值。

4 个解决方案

#1


57  

You were close with your idea. It turns out that passing undefined for a prop is the same as not including it at all, which will still trigger the default prop value. So you could do something like this:

你接近你的想法。事实证明,传递未定义的道具与完全不包括它相同,这仍将触发默认道具值。所以你可以这样做:

var parent = React.createClass({
  propTypes: {
    editable: React.PropTypes.bool.isRequired,
    editableOpts: React.PropTypes.shape({...})
  },
  render: function() {
    return <Child 
      editable={this.props.editable ?
                  this.props.editableOpts : 
                  undefined}
    />;
  }
});

#2


3  

Define props variable:

定义道具变量:

let props = {};
if (this.props.editable){
  props.editable = this.props.editable;
}

And then use it in JSX:

然后在JSX中使用它:

<Child {...props} />

Here is a solution in your code:

以下是代码中的解决方案:

var parent = React.createClass({
  propTypes: {
    editable: React.PropTypes.bool.isRequired,
    editableOpts: React.PropTypes.shape({...})
  },
  render: function() {
    let props = {};
    if (this.props.editable){
      props.editable = this.props.editable;
    }
    return (
      <Child {...props} />
    );
  }
});

Source, React documentation: https://facebook.github.io/react/docs/jsx-in-depth.html#spread-attributes

来源,反应文档:https://facebook.github.io/react/docs/jsx-in-depth.html#spread-attributes

#3


0  

add a spread operator to the this.props.editable

将扩展运算符添加到this.props.editable

<Child {...this.props.editable ? editable={this.props.editableOpts} : null} >

should work

#4


-1  

const CleaningItem = ({ disabled = false }) => (
 <View
     style={[styles.container, disabled && styles.disabled]}
     pointerEvents={disabled ? 'none' : 'auto'}
 >
     <Button
         disabled={disabled || null}
         title="SELECT"
     />
 </View>
);
智能推荐

注意!

本站翻译的文章,版权归属于本站,未经许可禁止转摘,转摘请注明本文地址:http://www.silva-art.net/blog/2015/08/26/a8ac36258bc054bf194a8839132cc60d.html



 
© 2014-2019 ITdaan.com 粤ICP备14056181号  

赞助商广告